InData Labs
Cyprus-headquartered data science firm with its own R&D center, founded by a video-gaming industry veteran.
Founded 2014 | Nicosia, Cyprus (R&D and delivery centers in Lithuania and the US) | 80+ employees
ml-developmentai-consultingdata-engineeringgenerative-ai
What is InData Labs?
InData Labs is a data science and AI consultancy legally headquartered in Nicosia, Cyprus, founded in 2014 by video-gaming industry veteran Marat Karpeko, with R&D and delivery centers in Lithuania and the US. The 80+ person firm runs its own R&D center and covers a wide technical band from generative AI and GPT integration through predictive analytics, forecasting, and computer vision. Its Cyprus legal HQ gives clients an EU-entity contracting structure alongside nearshore delivery capacity.
InData Labs was founded in 2014 and is headquartered in Nicosia, Cyprus (R&D and delivery centers in Lithuania and the US). The firm employs 80+ people and works primarily with clients in Cross-industry, Predictive Analytics sectors. Its primary differentiator is: Runs its own R&D center rather than purely project-based delivery, spanning generative AI/GPT integration through classic predictive analytics and computer vision.
InData Labs tech stack and services
PythonGenerative AI/GPT toolingComputer vision frameworksBig data pipelines
| Service area |
|---|
| ML Development |
| AI Consulting |
| Data Engineering |
| Generative AI |
InData Labs use cases
Short answer: InData Labs is best suited for companies wanting decade-plus data science, in-house R&D.
| Use case |
|---|
| Generative AI and GPT integration projects |
| Predictive analytics and forecasting |
| Computer vision pilots |
| Big data infrastructure builds |
InData Labs pricing
Short answer: InData Labs uses a fixed project, time & materials pricing approach. Minimum engagement starts at Not published.
| Engagement model | Typical range | Best for |
|---|---|---|
| Fixed project | From Not published | Well-defined scope |
| Time & Materials | Variable; depends on team size | Large programmes or team augmentation |
InData Labs does not publish a public rate card. Contact them directly via their website to get project-specific pricing.
InData Labs pros and cons
| Advantages | Things to consider |
|---|---|
| +Founded 2014 — one of the longer-running boutique data science firms in this list | -80+ employee band is imprecise — exact current headcount is not independently published |
| +In-house R&D center is a differentiator versus pure staff-augmentation vendors | -Legal HQ (Cyprus) is a smaller AI hub than its Lithuania delivery center, which may matter to buyers wanting an on-the-ground presence |
| +Cyprus legal HQ with Lithuania/US delivery centers gives EU-entity contracting plus nearshore delivery | -Pricing model and minimum engagement are not published |
| +Broad technical range from generative AI to classic forecasting and computer vision |
InData Labs vs alternatives
How InData Labs compares to the other top Machine Learning Development companies.
| Company | Best for | Key difference | Rating | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| dida Datenschmiede | Research-grade ML from a PhD-level boutique team. | Team composed primarily of mathematicians and physicists, explicitly rejecting black-box tooling in favor of custom-built models as its sole service line. | 4.8 | Full comparison |
| Tensorway | Mid-market fintech and energy, boutique forecasting models. | spun out of an established software company's applied R&D unit in 2019, giving it delivery processes more mature than most five-year-old AI boutiques. | 4.6 | Full comparison |
| NILG.AI | Early-stage AI adopters, structured discover-pilot-scale model. | Founder-led by a University of Porto PhD with a public AI-education arm (100K+ YouTube subscribers, Microsoft education partner) that doubles as a technical credibility signal. | 4.5 | Full comparison |
| Neurons Lab | Financial services, agentic AI with built-in governance. | Positions itself as an end-to-end AI enablement partner specifically for financial services, with governance and compliance tooling built into the core offer rather than added on. | 4.5 | Full comparison |
| Addepto | Aviation, logistics, finance — PoC to production MLOps. | Explicit 'proof-of-concept to production' positioning addresses the common failure mode where enterprise ML pilots never reach deployment. | 4.4 | Full comparison |
| Xomnia | Dutch/NW European enterprises, data strategy plus agentic AI. | Acquired Aurai in 2025 specifically to consolidate strategy, platform, and applied-AI capability under one roof as it scales toward regional market leadership. | 4.3 | Full comparison |
| WeAreBrain | Startups, AI-native product development plus modernization. | Frames itself around culture and retention — 'a winning team, not an agency' — with a long average client tenure as central to its pitch alongside technical delivery. | 4.3 | Full comparison |
| Deeper Insights | Healthcare, real estate, finance — UK research-heavy AI... | Team holds 500+ citations and patents globally (per company website), signaling research depth rather than a purely delivery-focused staffing model. | 4.3 | Full comparison |
| Alexander Thamm | DACH automotive/manufacturing, manufacturer-independent AI at scale. | 'Whitebox solutions' positioning emphasizes transparency and manufacturer independence, backed by 3,500+ completed projects and blue-chip automotive clients. | 4.2 | Full comparison |
| Nexocode | Startups, small senior team for scoped generative AI. | Explicitly flat organizational structure with no traditional management hierarchy — every team member is described as equally involved in growth and delivery decisions. | 4.2 | Full comparison |
| Predli | Organizations, structured path from AI pilot to production. | 'Predli Studio' is a dedicated build function that turns AI strategy directly into production-grade custom solutions, rather than handing delivery to a separate vendor. | 4.2 | Full comparison |
| Synergy Labs | French/EU businesses, practical dashboards and recommenders. | Focuses specifically on business-facing applied ML — smart dashboards, customer segmentation, recommendation engines — built to EU compliance rules, rather than broad AI R&D. | 4.1 | Full comparison |
| xtream | Italian/EU scale-ups, AI embedded in product builds. | Combines UX design, product management, and software engineering with applied ML and BI — AI is delivered as part of a full digital-product build, not a bolt-on service. | 4.1 | Full comparison |
| element61 | Benelux enterprises, established analytics plus AI practice. | Started as an analytics and performance-management consultancy in 2007 and layered data science and AI on top of an already-mature BI practice, combining both under one roof. | 4.1 | Full comparison |
| Miquido | Companies wanting RAG, computer vision, on-device AI in... | Offers on-device AI development and AI guardrails alongside core ML, computer vision, and NLP work — a more product-engineering-centric AI offering than pure consulting-first competitors. | 4.1 | Full comparison |
| Neoteric | Companies wanting well-reviewed Polish generative AI, recommenders. | 4.9/5 rating across 70 verified Clutch reviews and 300+ completed projects across five continents gives an unusually large, independently verifiable review base for a company of this size. | 4.0 | Full comparison |
| Grape Up | Automotive and finance, agentic AI plus legacy modernization. | Built its own productized platforms (Databoostr, Cloudboostr) alongside custom delivery — a hybrid product-plus-services model less common among pure consultancies on this list. | 4.0 | Full comparison |
| Deviniti | Regulated enterprises, generative AI/RAG, Atlassian-ecosystem roots. | 50+ Atlassian-certified professionals and Atlassian Partner of the Year finalist status give it unusually strong enterprise-IT integration credibility alongside its generative AI practice and Bielik.AI open-source contributions. | 4.0 | Full comparison |
| STX Next | Enterprises wanting Python-native ML, multi-cloud partnerships. | Built and open-sourced DeepNext, an autonomous AI developer agent, and holds AWS Advanced Tier, Snowflake, Databricks, Azure, and Amazon Bedrock partnerships simultaneously. | 4.0 | Full comparison |
| CN Group CZ | Nordic/DACH enterprises, AI/ML plus industrial automation. | Combines Scandinavian management style with Czech, Slovak, and Romanian engineering talent, and layers AI/ML onto a much older core business in embedded systems and industrial automation. | 3.9 | Full comparison |
| ASSIST Software | DACH manufacturing/agriculture, EU-funded AI R&D. | Runs 25+ active R&D projects and participates in 25+ EU-funded research programs alongside 160+ research-institution partnerships — an unusually research-heavy profile for a 30+ year old nearshore vendor. | 3.9 | Full comparison |
| Software Mind | Large enterprises, AI/ML plus custom software at scale. | 48-month average client relationship length and ISO 9001/14001/27001 certification stack signal an enterprise-process-mature vendor built for long-term programs rather than short AI pilots. | 3.9 | Full comparison |
| Future Processing | Insurance, finance, energy — outcome-based AI, measurable ROI. | Publicly states that 95% of generative AI pilots deliver no measurable return and positions its own outcome-based delivery approach against that failure pattern, backed by named case studies with hard percentage metrics. | 3.9 | Full comparison |
| SPD Technology | Fintech and payments, direct OpenAI and Anthropic partnerships. | Secured direct partnerships with OpenAI, Anthropic, and AWS specifically to reinforce its cloud and AI/ML capabilities — a more direct foundation-model-vendor relationship than most peers on this list disclose. | 3.9 | Full comparison |
| Zühlke | Regulated enterprises, AI within a 55-year engineering firm. | Founded in 1968 as a product-innovation engineering firm, giving it a far longer institutional track record than any other company on this list — AI/ML is one current-generation capability within a much broader innovation-consulting practice. | 3.9 | Full comparison |
| Arnia Software | Companies needing R&D-level engineering, ML as an extension. | Machine learning expertise grew out of Arnia's original R&D work in database engines and operating systems, giving it lower-level systems engineering depth uncommon among application-focused AI vendors on this list. | 3.8 | Full comparison |
| Reaktor | Enterprises wanting AI within human-centred product design. | Co-created 'Elements of AI,' a free AI literacy MOOC with the University of Helsinki taken by over half a million people worldwide — a public-education contribution unmatched by any other company on this list. | 3.8 | Full comparison |
| Framna | Nordic/Benelux enterprises, mobile-first AI-integrated products. | Formed in 2023 through the merger of three established agencies backed by Waterland Private Equity, giving it unusually broad simultaneous coverage of Sweden, Denmark, the Netherlands, and Poland under one group. | 3.8 | Full comparison |
| N-iX | Large enterprises, AI-augmented engineering at scale. | Legally headquartered in Valletta, Malta, with its primary engineering hub historically in Lviv, Ukraine; relocated 600+ Ukrainian engineers to safety in 2022 without dropping a single client project, and reports zero delivery disruptions since founding in 2002. | 3.8 | Full comparison |
| Sigma Software | Large enterprises, Swedish-incorporated EU IT consultancy at scale. | 60% owned by the Swedish Sigma Group since 2006, giving Sigma Software a Swedish corporate parent and legal entity while its founding engineering culture and historical delivery base trace to Kharkiv, Ukraine. | 3.7 | Full comparison |
| Nordcloud (an IBM Company) | Cloud-committed enterprises, IBM-backed managed AI services. | Acquired by IBM in 2020 and now operates as an IBM subsidiary, giving it direct backing from one of the largest enterprise technology vendors globally, while holding all three major cloud certifications simultaneously. | 3.7 | Full comparison |
InData Labs FAQ
What is InData Labs?
InData Labs is a data science and AI consultancy legally headquartered in Nicosia, Cyprus, founded in 2014 by video-gaming industry veteran Marat Karpeko, with R&D and delivery centers in Lithuania and the US. The 80+ person firm runs its own R&D center and covers a wide technical band from generative AI and GPT integration through predictive analytics, forecasting, and computer vision. Its Cyprus legal HQ gives clients an EU-entity contracting structure alongside nearshore delivery capacity.
How much does InData Labs charge?
InData Labs uses fixed project, time & materials pricing. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. A discovery call is required to get project-specific quotes.
What tech stack does InData Labs use?
InData Labs works with Python, Generative AI/GPT tooling, Computer vision frameworks, Big data pipelines. Primary industries served include Cross-industry, Predictive Analytics.
Is InData Labs right for enterprise?
Companies wanting decade-plus data science, in-house R&D. 80+ team size. Key consideration: 80+ employee band is imprecise — exact current headcount is not independently published.
What are the best InData Labs alternatives?
The best alternatives to InData Labs depend on your use case. Top options are:
- dida Datenschmiede: team composed primarily of mathematicians and physicists, explicitly rejecting black-box tooling in favor of custom-built models as its sole service line.
- Tensorway: spun out of an established software company's applied r&d unit in 2019, giving it delivery processes more mature than most five-year-old ai boutiques.
- NILG.AI: founder-led by a university of porto phd with a public ai-education arm (100k+ youtube subscribers, microsoft education partner) that doubles as a technical credibility signal.
Compare InData Labs with other Machine Learning Development companies
InData Labs vs dida Datenschmiede InData Labs vs Tensorway InData Labs vs NILG.AI InData Labs vs Neurons Lab InData Labs vs Addepto InData Labs vs Xomnia InData Labs vs WeAreBrain InData Labs vs Deeper Insights InData Labs vs Alexander Thamm InData Labs vs Nexocode InData Labs vs Predli InData Labs vs Synergy Labs InData Labs vs xtream InData Labs vs element61 InData Labs vs Miquido InData Labs vs Neoteric InData Labs vs Grape Up InData Labs vs Deviniti InData Labs vs STX Next InData Labs vs CN Group CZ InData Labs vs ASSIST Software InData Labs vs Software Mind InData Labs vs Future Processing InData Labs vs SPD Technology InData Labs vs Zühlke InData Labs vs Arnia Software InData Labs vs Reaktor InData Labs vs Framna InData Labs vs N-iX InData Labs vs Sigma Software InData Labs vs Nordcloud (an IBM Company)