InData Labs vs Xomnia: full comparison for 2026
Last updated: July 2026
Quick verdict
InData Labs (4.4/5) edges ahead of Xomnia (4.3/5) overall. InData Labs is the better choice for companies wanting a decade-plus data science track record with in-house R&D rather than a pure project-delivery shop.. Xomnia is the stronger option for dutch and Northwest European enterprises wanting a single consultancy for data strategy, cloud data platforms, and applied or agentic AI delivery.. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
InData Labs vs Xomnia: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | InData Labs | Xomnia |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2014 | 2013 |
| HQ | Nicosia, Cyprus (R&D and delivery centers in Lithuania and the US) | Amsterdam, Netherlands |
| Team size | 80+ | 135+ (post-Aurai acquisition, 2025) |
| Rating | 4.4 / 5 | 4.3 / 5 |
| Best for | Companies wanting a decade-plus data science track record with in-house R&D rather than a pure project-delivery shop. | Dutch and Northwest European enterprises wanting a single consultancy for data strategy, cloud data platforms, and applied or agentic AI delivery. |
| Pricing model | Fixed project, Time & Materials | Consulting retainer, dedicated team |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | Python, Generative AI/GPT tooling, Computer vision frameworks | Python, Cloud data platforms, Agentic AI frameworks |
| Industries served | Cross-industry, Predictive Analytics | Retail/E-commerce, Energy & Utilities, Healthcare, Financial Services, Public Sector |
InData Labs vs Xomnia: overview
InData Labs
InData Labs is a data science and AI consultancy legally headquartered in Nicosia, Cyprus, founded in 2014 by video-gaming industry veteran Marat Karpeko, with R&D and delivery centers in Lithuania and the US. The 80+ person firm runs its own R&D center and covers a wide technical band from generative AI and GPT integration through predictive analytics, forecasting, and computer vision. Its Cyprus legal HQ gives clients an EU-entity contracting structure alongside nearshore delivery capacity.
Xomnia
Xomnia is an Amsterdam, Netherlands data-and-AI consultancy founded in 2013, covering data strategy, cloud data platforms, agentic AI, and EU-hosted cloud solutions. In June 2025 it acquired Aurai specifically to scale toward becoming Northwest Europe's leading data and AI consultancy, growing its collective team past 135 specialists. Its client roster includes Rabobank, Vodafone Ziggo, ProRail, and NS (per company website), spanning retail, mobility, energy, healthcare, and public-sector work.
Services and capabilities: InData Labs vs Xomnia
| Capability | InData Labs | Xomnia |
|---|---|---|
| ML Development | ✓ | ✗ |
| AI Consulting | ✓ | ✓ |
| Computer Vision | ✗ | ✗ |
| NLP | ✗ | ✗ |
| Generative AI | ✓ | ✓ |
| MLOps | ✗ | ✓ |
| Data Engineering | ✓ | ✓ |
| Staff Augmentation | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: InData Labs vs Xomnia
| Framework / platform | InData Labs | Xomnia |
|---|---|---|
| Python | ✓ | ✓ |
| AWS | N/A | N/A |
| Microsoft Azure | N/A | N/A |
| Google Cloud | N/A | N/A |
| Kubernetes | N/A | N/A |
| PyTorch | N/A | N/A |
| LangChain | N/A | N/A |
| Databricks | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: InData Labs vs Xomnia
| Criterion | InData Labs | Xomnia |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Time & Materials | Consulting retainer, Dedicated team, Fixed project |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Enterprise / mid-market | Enterprise / mid-market |
Target audience comparison: InData Labs vs Xomnia
| Dimension | InData Labs | Xomnia |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Cross-industry, Predictive Analytics | Retail/E-commerce, Energy & Utilities, Healthcare |
| Best use cases | Generative AI and GPT integration projects, Predictive analytics and forecasting | Enterprise data and AI strategy roadmaps, Cloud data platform builds |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Consulting retainer |
InData Labs vs Xomnia: pros and cons
| InData Labs | |
|---|---|
| + | Founded 2014 — one of the longer-running boutique data science firms in this list |
| + | In-house R&D center is a differentiator versus pure staff-augmentation vendors |
| + | Cyprus legal HQ with Lithuania/US delivery centers gives EU-entity contracting plus nearshore delivery |
| + | Broad technical range from generative AI to classic forecasting and computer vision |
| - | 80+ employee band is imprecise — exact current headcount is not independently published |
| - | Legal HQ (Cyprus) is a smaller AI hub than its Lithuania delivery center, which may matter to buyers wanting an on-the-ground presence |
| - | Pricing model and minimum engagement are not published |
| Xomnia | |
|---|---|
| + | Long, blue-chip client list including Rabobank, Vodafone Ziggo, ProRail, and NS (per company website) |
| + | 2025 Aurai acquisition materially increased delivery capacity and breadth |
| + | EU-hosted cloud solutions directly address data-residency concerns for Dutch and EU clients |
| + | Founded 2013 — over a decade of Netherlands market presence |
| - | Recent acquisition (Aurai, 2025) means integrated team structure and delivery consistency are still settling |
| - | Broad data-and-AI positioning is less narrowly specialized than pure-play ML boutiques on this list |
| - | Pricing and minimum engagement are not published |
Who should choose InData Labs?
InData Labs is the right choice for companies wanting a decade-plus data science track record with in-house R&D rather than a pure project-delivery shop..
Runs its own R&D center rather than purely project-based delivery, spanning generative AI/GPT integration through classic predictive analytics and computer vision.. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in Cross-industry, Predictive Analytics.
Who should choose Xomnia?
Xomnia is the right choice for dutch and Northwest European enterprises wanting a single consultancy for data strategy, cloud data platforms, and applied or agentic AI delivery..
Acquired Aurai in 2025 specifically to consolidate strategy, platform, and applied-AI capability under one roof as it scales toward regional market leadership.. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in Retail/E-commerce, Energy & Utilities, Healthcare, Financial Services, Public Sector.
Decision matrix: InData Labs vs Xomnia
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | InData Labs |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Xomnia |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: InData Labs (Not published) vs Xomnia (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Xomnia |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | InData Labs |
Use case fit: InData Labs vs Xomnia
| Use case | InData Labs fit | Xomnia fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Generative AI and GPT integration projects | Strong | Limited | InData Labs |
| Predictive analytics and forecasting | Strong | Limited | InData Labs |
| Enterprise data and AI strategy roadmaps | Limited | Strong | Xomnia |
| Cloud data platform builds | Limited | Strong | Xomnia |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: InData Labs vs Xomnia
InData Labs (4.4/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Machine Learning Development projects. Runs its own R&D center rather than purely project-based delivery, spanning generative AI/GPT integration through classic predictive analytics and computer vision.. It is best for companies wanting a decade-plus data science track record with in-house R&D rather than a pure project-delivery shop..
Xomnia (4.3/5) is the better choice when dutch and Northwest European enterprises wanting a single consultancy for data strategy, cloud data platforms, and applied or agentic AI delivery.. If your situation matches those criteria, Xomnia is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
InData Labs vs Xomnia FAQ
Is InData Labs better than Xomnia?
InData Labs (4.4/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. InData Labs is better for companies wanting a decade-plus data science track record with in-house R&D rather than a pure project-delivery shop.. Xomnia is better for dutch and Northwest European enterprises wanting a single consultancy for data strategy, cloud data platforms, and applied or agentic AI delivery..
How do InData Labs and Xomnia differ in pricing?
InData Labs uses fixed project, time & materials pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. Xomnia uses consulting retainer, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: InData Labs or Xomnia?
Xomnia is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between InData Labs and Xomnia?
InData Labs's primary differentiator is: runs its own r&d center rather than purely project-based delivery, spanning generative ai/gpt integration through classic predictive analytics and computer vision.. Xomnia's primary differentiator is: acquired aurai in 2025 specifically to consolidate strategy, platform, and applied-ai capability under one roof as it scales toward regional market leadership.. They also differ in team size (80+ vs 135+ (post-Aurai acquisition, 2025)), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Cross-industry, Predictive Analytics vs Retail/E-commerce, Energy & Utilities).
Last reviewed: July 2026. Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.