WeAreBrain vs N-iX: full comparison for 2026
Last updated: July 2026
Quick verdict
WeAreBrain (4.3/5) edges ahead of N-iX (3.8/5) overall. WeAreBrain is the better choice for startups and scale-ups wanting AI-native product development combined with broader software modernization, not just an isolated ML model.. N-iX is the stronger option for large enterprises wanting AI-augmented software engineering at significant scale, from a vendor with an unusually long record of zero delivery disruption through wartime relocation.. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
WeAreBrain vs N-iX: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | WeAreBrain | N-iX |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2015 | 2002 |
| HQ | Netherlands (internationally distributed team) | Valletta, Malta (legal HQ; primary engineering hub historically in Lviv, Ukraine) |
| Team size | 60+ | 2,400+ |
| Rating | 4.3 / 5 | 3.8 / 5 |
| Best for | Startups and scale-ups wanting AI-native product development combined with broader software modernization, not just an isolated ML model. | Large enterprises wanting AI-augmented software engineering at significant scale, from a vendor with an unusually long record of zero delivery disruption through wartime relocation. |
| Pricing model | Dedicated team, fixed project | Dedicated team, staff augmentation, fixed project |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published (enterprise-scale) |
| Primary tech stack | Python, AI product tooling, Shopify/SAP Commerce Cloud integrations | Python, AWS, Microsoft Azure |
| Industries served | Transport & Logistics, Healthcare, EdTech, Retail/E-commerce | Financial Services, Retail/E-commerce, Healthcare, Manufacturing, Automotive |
WeAreBrain vs N-iX: overview
WeAreBrain
WeAreBrain is a Netherlands-headquartered AI-native product studio founded in 2015, combining AI product development with software modernization, e-commerce integrations, and automation services. It describes itself as 'a winning team, not an agency,' with a 60+ person, 13-nationality team and an average client tenure of 3.8 years, alongside an NPS score above 80 (per company website). Named clients include SidelineSwap and clevergig, which was acquired by Visma.
N-iX
N-iX is a software engineering group founded in 2002, legally headquartered in Valletta, Malta, with its historical primary engineering hub in Lviv, Ukraine. It has 2,400+ engineers across 10 countries, serves clients including Bosch, Siemens, eBay, and Inditex (per company website), and reports zero delivery disruptions since founding — including relocating 600+ Ukrainian engineers to safety in 2022 without dropping a single client project. It delivers AI-augmented development, cloud, data analytics, and cybersecurity services.
Services and capabilities: WeAreBrain vs N-iX
| Capability | WeAreBrain | N-iX |
|---|---|---|
| ML Development | ✓ | ✓ |
| AI Consulting | ✓ | ✓ |
| Computer Vision | ✗ | ✗ |
| NLP | ✗ | ✗ |
| Generative AI | ✓ | ✗ |
| MLOps | ✗ | ✗ |
| Data Engineering | ✗ | ✓ |
| Staff Augmentation | ✗ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: WeAreBrain vs N-iX
| Framework / platform | WeAreBrain | N-iX |
|---|---|---|
| Python | ✓ | ✓ |
| AWS | N/A | ✓ |
| Microsoft Azure | N/A | ✓ |
| Google Cloud | N/A | ✓ |
| Kubernetes | N/A | N/A |
| PyTorch | N/A | N/A |
| LangChain | N/A | N/A |
| Databricks | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: WeAreBrain vs N-iX
| Criterion | WeAreBrain | N-iX |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published (enterprise-scale) |
| Engagement models | Dedicated team, Fixed project | Dedicated team, Staff augmentation, Fixed project |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Enterprise / mid-market | Enterprise / mid-market |
Target audience comparison: WeAreBrain vs N-iX
| Dimension | WeAreBrain | N-iX |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Enterprise |
| Best industries | Transport & Logistics, Healthcare, EdTech | Financial Services, Retail/E-commerce, Healthcare |
| Best use cases | AI-native product MVP development, E-commerce AI personalization | AI-augmented software engineering at enterprise scale, Data analytics and engineering for finance and retail clients |
| Typical project type | Dedicated team | Dedicated team |
WeAreBrain vs N-iX: pros and cons
| WeAreBrain | |
|---|---|
| + | 80+ NPS and 3.8-year average client tenure signal strong retention (per company website) |
| + | 13-nationality team supports multilingual, multi-market European delivery |
| + | Combines AI-native product development with broader software modernization services |
| + | Founded 2015 with a decade of continuous operation |
| - | Broader software, e-commerce, and automation service lines mean ML is one of several offerings, not the sole focus |
| - | 60+ team size is modest relative to enterprise-scale competitors on this list |
| - | Notable named clients (SidelineSwap, clevergig) are smaller-profile than some competitors' enterprise logos |
| N-iX | |
|---|---|
| + | 2,400+ engineers across 10 countries make it one of the largest-scale vendors on this list |
| + | Blue-chip client roster including Bosch, Siemens, eBay, and Inditex (per company website) |
| + | Average client relationships of 7+ years suggest strong long-term retention |
| + | Malta legal HQ provides an EU-entity contracting structure alongside deep Ukraine-based engineering talent |
| - | Legal HQ (Malta) is a holding structure rather than where the bulk of day-to-day engineering happens (historically Lviv, Ukraine) — buyers should understand this distinction before contracting |
| - | 2,400+ person, 10-country scale means AI/ML is one capability among many broad software engineering services |
| - | 'AI-augmented development' framing suggests AI tooling assists engineering delivery broadly, rather than the company positioning itself as a pure ML specialist |
Who should choose WeAreBrain?
WeAreBrain is the right choice for startups and scale-ups wanting AI-native product development combined with broader software modernization, not just an isolated ML model..
Frames itself around culture and retention — 'a winning team, not an agency' — with a long average client tenure as central to its pitch alongside technical delivery.. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in Transport & Logistics, Healthcare, EdTech, Retail/E-commerce.
Who should choose N-iX?
N-iX is the right choice for large enterprises wanting AI-augmented software engineering at significant scale, from a vendor with an unusually long record of zero delivery disruption through wartime relocation..
Legally headquartered in Valletta, Malta, with its primary engineering hub historically in Lviv, Ukraine; relocated 600+ Ukrainian engineers to safety in 2022 without dropping a single client project, and reports zero delivery disruptions since founding in 2002.. Minimum engagement starts at Not published (enterprise-scale). Works best with clients in Financial Services, Retail/E-commerce, Healthcare, Manufacturing, Automotive.
Decision matrix: WeAreBrain vs N-iX
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | WeAreBrain |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | WeAreBrain |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: WeAreBrain (Not published) vs N-iX (Not published (enterprise-scale)) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | N-iX |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | N-iX |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | WeAreBrain |
Use case fit: WeAreBrain vs N-iX
| Use case | WeAreBrain fit | N-iX fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| AI-native product MVP development | Strong | Limited | WeAreBrain |
| E-commerce AI personalization | Strong | Limited | WeAreBrain |
| AI-augmented software engineering at enterprise scale | Limited | Strong | N-iX |
| Data analytics and engineering for finance and retail clients | Limited | Strong | N-iX |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: WeAreBrain vs N-iX
WeAreBrain (4.3/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Machine Learning Development projects. Frames itself around culture and retention — 'a winning team, not an agency' — with a long average client tenure as central to its pitch alongside technical delivery.. It is best for startups and scale-ups wanting AI-native product development combined with broader software modernization, not just an isolated ML model..
N-iX (3.8/5) is the better choice when large enterprises wanting AI-augmented software engineering at significant scale, from a vendor with an unusually long record of zero delivery disruption through wartime relocation.. If your situation matches those criteria, N-iX is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
WeAreBrain vs N-iX FAQ
Is WeAreBrain better than N-iX?
WeAreBrain (4.3/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. WeAreBrain is better for startups and scale-ups wanting AI-native product development combined with broader software modernization, not just an isolated ML model.. N-iX is better for large enterprises wanting AI-augmented software engineering at significant scale, from a vendor with an unusually long record of zero delivery disruption through wartime relocation..
How do WeAreBrain and N-iX differ in pricing?
WeAreBrain uses dedicated team, fixed project pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. N-iX uses dedicated team, staff augmentation, fixed project pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published (enterprise-scale). Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: WeAreBrain or N-iX?
N-iX is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between WeAreBrain and N-iX?
WeAreBrain's primary differentiator is: frames itself around culture and retention — 'a winning team, not an agency' — with a long average client tenure as central to its pitch alongside technical delivery.. N-iX's primary differentiator is: legally headquartered in valletta, malta, with its primary engineering hub historically in lviv, ukraine; relocated 600+ ukrainian engineers to safety in 2022 without dropping a single client project, and reports zero delivery disruptions since founding in 2002.. They also differ in team size (60+ vs 2,400+), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published (enterprise-scale)), and primary industries served (Transport & Logistics, Healthcare vs Financial Services, Retail/E-commerce).
Last reviewed: July 2026. Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.